Shavit Kimchi vs Mika Dagan Fruchtman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Kimchi vs M. Dagan Fruchtman

Shavit Kimchi
ISR
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
23
Age
22
-
Height
-
893
C. Rank
894
415
Best Rank
771
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Mika Dagan Fruchtman
ISR
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
23
Age
22
-
Height
-
893
C. Rank
894
415
Best Rank
771
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kimchi 0 - 0 Fruchtman
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimchi | 0 |
| Fruchtman | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
S. Kimchi vs M. D. Fruchtman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.67% (85-65) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (53-53) |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Kimchi vs M. D. Fruchtman Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shavit Kimchi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mika Dagan Fruchtman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shavit Kimchi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mika Dagan Fruchtman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shavit Kimchi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mika Dagan Fruchtman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shavit Kimchi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mika Dagan Fruchtman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shavit Kimchi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 36/22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/1). Mika Dagan Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 16/12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/41).
- Player level: In the last year, Shavit Kimchi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mika Dagan Fruchtman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shavit Kimchi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mika Dagan Fruchtman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shavit Kimchi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mika Dagan Fruchtman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shavit Kimchi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mika Dagan Fruchtman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Shavit Kimchi vs Mika Dagan Fruchtman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kimchi 0%, Fruchtman 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kimchi 0%, Fruchtman 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kimchi 0%, Fruchtman 0%.
S. Kimchi Recent Matches Played
M. D. Fruchtman Recent Matches Played

S. Kimchi vs M. D. Fruchtman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.67% (85/65) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (53/53) |
| 55.29% (188/152) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.37% (118/121) |
| 51.95% (1642/1519) | Games Win/Loss | 49.75% (1104/1115) |
| 53.33% (48/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.44% (37/41) |
| 62.07% (36/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (16/12) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 160 | Aces Total | 52 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
| 475 | Total Double Faults | 456 |
| 1:28:46 | Average Match Time | 1:19:56 |
| 508.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.27 |
| 61% (5113/8340) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3411/5254) |
| 60% (3046/5113) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1970/3411) |
| 45% (1437/3227) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (728/1841) |
| 50% (531/1067) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (316/684) |
| 47% (3906/8321) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2538/5442) |
| 52.05% (38/35) | Challenger W/L | 48.15% (26/28) |
| 61.04% (47/30) | Futures W/L | 51.92% (27/25) |
| 56% (84/149) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (52/105) |
| 54% (19/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 54% (22/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 87% (86/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (51/45) |
| 13% (86/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (51/6) |
| 16% (64/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (55/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
3.34
W2
1.27
05:30 PM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.22
W2
3.74
09:30 PM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.38
W2
2.76
12:00 AM 10/11/25
PredictionW1
1.31
W2
3.08
01:00 AM 10/11/25
PredictionW1
1.028
W2
8.7
10:30 PM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.166
W2
4.35
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
09 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 9th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Mayar Sherif vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 9th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Renata Zarazua vs Carmen Andreea Herea Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Tucuman Open – Tucuman Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Simona Waltert Betting Tips & Picks November 9, 2025
08 Nov 2025
Tucuman Open – Tucuman Preview And Prediction: Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Despina Papamichail Betting Tips & Picks November 9, 2025
08 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Marina Stakusic Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 East Lansing
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Montreal
Canada
M25 Santa Cruz do Sul
Brazil
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal